quote:

Originally posted by Paul_B:
For the SGM we have received notification of the agenda and of the fact that each party can present their views in writing to the membership before the meeting.

Does that mean that there will be any opportunity for example to discuss the possibility of redefining slightly the role of the supporter directors as my thoughts below? Or is the agenda rigid?

Possibly the role of supporter director should be defined as 'non executive' director (or chairman even) but if the role becomes in any way 'executive' they must resign as trust director and be appointed to the club board in the way anyone else could become a director of the club board?

It is because the supporter directors have formed a majority 'executive' faction of the club board that we are in this mess. We need a Club Managing Director/Chief Executive to be appointed SOON.